Post by account_disabled on Mar 12, 2024 3:04:36 GMT -5
It was recently announced that employers are not required to register domestic workers with the Mexican Social Security Institute . Given this measure, several people and organizations are appealing it, saying that it is a discriminatory measure.
For this reason, some members of the Nosotrxs movement met with a SCJN minister to explain why the voluntary Social Security regime for domestic workers is discriminatory.
Discrimination against domestic workers
A few days ago, the minister of the Supreme Court Czech Republic Mobile Number List of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), Alberto Pérez Dayán, withdrew his draft ruling in which he considered it constitutional that the social security of domestic employees was voluntary, after several days of pressure by society, which requested that this benefit be mandatory.
The case became a clear example of the power of civil society to force political, legislative and, as a consequence, social changes.
So Forbes did an investigation and during it, he learned that some representatives of the Nosotrxs collective met with a minister of the High Court to explain the real situation that domestic employees are experiencing. And so, show you how the Federal Labor Law (LGT) and the General Social Security Law (LGSS) not only does not protect them, but discriminates against them.
According to Andrea Santiago, representative of Nosotxas, said that the group considers the articles of the LFT and the LGSS can be interpreted as unconstitutional because the voluntary regime makes the Social Security of domestic workers depend on the will of the employers. Therefore, it becomes a right that they have to negotiate with them, when rights should not be negotiable.
“The fact that the Court believes that this voluntary regime is equivalent to the mandatory one is a lack of sensitivity. The minister thinks that he does protect them, when in reality he does not. In addition, he excludes them from certain benefits, such as daycare, when 80% of the workers are mothers and of them, 20% are single mothers,” Santiago explained in an interview with Forbes Mexico.
For this reason, some members of the Nosotrxs movement met with a SCJN minister to explain why the voluntary Social Security regime for domestic workers is discriminatory.
Discrimination against domestic workers
A few days ago, the minister of the Supreme Court Czech Republic Mobile Number List of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), Alberto Pérez Dayán, withdrew his draft ruling in which he considered it constitutional that the social security of domestic employees was voluntary, after several days of pressure by society, which requested that this benefit be mandatory.
The case became a clear example of the power of civil society to force political, legislative and, as a consequence, social changes.
So Forbes did an investigation and during it, he learned that some representatives of the Nosotrxs collective met with a minister of the High Court to explain the real situation that domestic employees are experiencing. And so, show you how the Federal Labor Law (LGT) and the General Social Security Law (LGSS) not only does not protect them, but discriminates against them.
According to Andrea Santiago, representative of Nosotxas, said that the group considers the articles of the LFT and the LGSS can be interpreted as unconstitutional because the voluntary regime makes the Social Security of domestic workers depend on the will of the employers. Therefore, it becomes a right that they have to negotiate with them, when rights should not be negotiable.
“The fact that the Court believes that this voluntary regime is equivalent to the mandatory one is a lack of sensitivity. The minister thinks that he does protect them, when in reality he does not. In addition, he excludes them from certain benefits, such as daycare, when 80% of the workers are mothers and of them, 20% are single mothers,” Santiago explained in an interview with Forbes Mexico.