Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 4:38:40 GMT -5
It will be the responsibility of the Attorney General's Office and the Federal Supreme Court because it is not my responsibility. At what point, in your opinion, did you describe that it is not your responsibility to deal with Congressman Paulinho's complaint? Adriana Scordamaglia — From the moment I found out about the inquiry, from the first to the last page, I selected those involved and saw that there was serious evidence against several people, which is why in my introductory quota I asked for inquiries to be set up to investigate in depth the involvement of these people. Is the MP concerned about the possibility of a conflict of jurisdiction arising due to the complaint against the mayor and deputy Paulinho? Adriana Scordamaglia — This hypothesis is unlikely to happen.
When offering the complaint, the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office was concerned with explaining why it only offered a complaint against some defendants. It was an investigation with detained Phone Number List defendants that had a shorter deadline, and the process also took place within a certain period of time. For this reason, the Public Prosecutor's Office limited the investigations even because article , of the Code of Criminal Procedure, allows this separation. Can telephone monitoring be used as material evidence? Adriana Scordamaglia — Of course. I would not offer any complaint, even if telephone monitoring is legal evidence and authorized by the competent Court, if there were no other evidence in the case file that corroborates the monitoring. Is there any evidence that BNDES employees may be involved in the scheme? Adriana Scordamaglia — Yes.
Some BNDES employees were cited, but have not yet been identified. The names appear in telephone monitoring. These quotes, however, need to be corroborated with other evidence. Was it for this reason that they requested the arrest of lawyer Ricardo Tosto more than once? Adriana Scordamaglia — With the filing of the complaint, her greater participation in the criminal scheme was confirmed. And the reason for Dr. Ricardo Tosto's request for preventive detention was exactly the convenience of criminal investigation. This is because there were and still are serious suspicions that he could, in some way, disrupt the criminal process. There is documentary evidence that this is evidently their intention: to end the investigations by the Federal Police and, therefore, end the process at the Federal Public Ministry.
When offering the complaint, the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office was concerned with explaining why it only offered a complaint against some defendants. It was an investigation with detained Phone Number List defendants that had a shorter deadline, and the process also took place within a certain period of time. For this reason, the Public Prosecutor's Office limited the investigations even because article , of the Code of Criminal Procedure, allows this separation. Can telephone monitoring be used as material evidence? Adriana Scordamaglia — Of course. I would not offer any complaint, even if telephone monitoring is legal evidence and authorized by the competent Court, if there were no other evidence in the case file that corroborates the monitoring. Is there any evidence that BNDES employees may be involved in the scheme? Adriana Scordamaglia — Yes.
Some BNDES employees were cited, but have not yet been identified. The names appear in telephone monitoring. These quotes, however, need to be corroborated with other evidence. Was it for this reason that they requested the arrest of lawyer Ricardo Tosto more than once? Adriana Scordamaglia — With the filing of the complaint, her greater participation in the criminal scheme was confirmed. And the reason for Dr. Ricardo Tosto's request for preventive detention was exactly the convenience of criminal investigation. This is because there were and still are serious suspicions that he could, in some way, disrupt the criminal process. There is documentary evidence that this is evidently their intention: to end the investigations by the Federal Police and, therefore, end the process at the Federal Public Ministry.