Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 4:38:13 GMT -5
The events recorded in the Cerro de la Estrella in Mexico City regarding the death of people due to dog attacks in December generated a series of comments about the role of CSOs, owners, animal lovers and the responsibility of the government that still It is still relevant. During the broadcast of the radio program on Wednesday, January 9, “Article Sixth” directed by Leo Zuckermann on Radio Formula along with Carlos Elizondo and Javier Aparicio, they addressed the topic. The comments were mainly based on the credibility of the news. They questioned whether the case of the pack that attacked people was possible. They recalled the conclusions reached by the forensic service and the telephone call made by a woman who was threatened by the dogs. As the presentations were given to question what the responsibility of the authority is, in this case, the Iztapalapa delegation and that of the Government of the Federal District in the management of dogs, the role played by some NGOs as they were cited was questioned, animal protectors or those who work for their rights. To a certain extent, the 3 analysts agreed in expressing their indignation that citizens were “more concerned and upset” by the defense that some NGOs made of dogs and, on the other hand, that they did not express their anger regarding the human victims, as if they were would have to exclude animal rights.
They finally came to the conclusion that it is a Phone Number List responsibility of the government that they are not up to and they are not even clear about what to do. The most recent information about the Iztapalapa dogs case has been that of the “insured” dogs, it has not been proven that at least 37 were not involved in the death of those people. There are, according to the most recent data, 54 dogs, both adults and puppies. Some animal rights activists demonstrated during the week with witty cries such as “Political dogs, Freedom” and another series of ingenious protests, such as giving life to the #yosoycan26 movement. The authority made a statement that has given an interesting twist regarding the reasons for the deaths of people due to dog attacks and proposed a new thesis: it is likely that those died due to dog attacks, but perhaps they could have been from dogs trained for clandestine fighting. , which makes the reality even more stark in Iztapalapa where there seems to be no authority as it allows its inhabitants to arm themselves and now establishes a program to exchange guns for money and other goods. This window of possibility does not distance the central objective that should be learned from this unfortunate lesson. Indeed, the death of these people generates sadness, horror and indignation, but it is also important not to neglect the rights of animals, if you will to a much lesser degree, but these events call into question the role that society should play. authority.
By trade you should be aware of trafficking in endangered species, cockfighting and dog fighting, unregulated commercialization of animals, etc. Once upon a time, the control of stray dogs in different cities was a “non-public” matter, that is, the authority went hunting for dogs without owners and, under the pretext of anti-rabies control, they were gathered in municipal or regional kennels and sacrificed with vicious processes. and suffering that were not made known, remained in secret. Various practically extermination methods were the subject of television and journalistic reports. I remember one of them broadcast in that series 60 Minutes hosted by Juan Ruiz Healy that really caused shame in the viewer for the atrocities that human beings are capable of carrying out. The journalistic complaints motivated the organization of citizens who have given life to animal protection societies and despite the advancement of methods and techniques for managing and controlling street canine populations, as Carlos Elizondo Mayer precisely reported in Zuckermann's program. In Mexico City, the authority has not yet established so-called “humanitarian” processes to address this responsibility and, it must be noted, it has been omitted to undertake canine control actions.
They finally came to the conclusion that it is a Phone Number List responsibility of the government that they are not up to and they are not even clear about what to do. The most recent information about the Iztapalapa dogs case has been that of the “insured” dogs, it has not been proven that at least 37 were not involved in the death of those people. There are, according to the most recent data, 54 dogs, both adults and puppies. Some animal rights activists demonstrated during the week with witty cries such as “Political dogs, Freedom” and another series of ingenious protests, such as giving life to the #yosoycan26 movement. The authority made a statement that has given an interesting twist regarding the reasons for the deaths of people due to dog attacks and proposed a new thesis: it is likely that those died due to dog attacks, but perhaps they could have been from dogs trained for clandestine fighting. , which makes the reality even more stark in Iztapalapa where there seems to be no authority as it allows its inhabitants to arm themselves and now establishes a program to exchange guns for money and other goods. This window of possibility does not distance the central objective that should be learned from this unfortunate lesson. Indeed, the death of these people generates sadness, horror and indignation, but it is also important not to neglect the rights of animals, if you will to a much lesser degree, but these events call into question the role that society should play. authority.
By trade you should be aware of trafficking in endangered species, cockfighting and dog fighting, unregulated commercialization of animals, etc. Once upon a time, the control of stray dogs in different cities was a “non-public” matter, that is, the authority went hunting for dogs without owners and, under the pretext of anti-rabies control, they were gathered in municipal or regional kennels and sacrificed with vicious processes. and suffering that were not made known, remained in secret. Various practically extermination methods were the subject of television and journalistic reports. I remember one of them broadcast in that series 60 Minutes hosted by Juan Ruiz Healy that really caused shame in the viewer for the atrocities that human beings are capable of carrying out. The journalistic complaints motivated the organization of citizens who have given life to animal protection societies and despite the advancement of methods and techniques for managing and controlling street canine populations, as Carlos Elizondo Mayer precisely reported in Zuckermann's program. In Mexico City, the authority has not yet established so-called “humanitarian” processes to address this responsibility and, it must be noted, it has been omitted to undertake canine control actions.