Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 3:51:53 GMT -5
Dogs, agents who searched the underground inch by inch... One fact: the set was secured at 4 in the afternoon. Since then, no one has been able to access it. -- after the debate, television executives were able to greet both candidates privately. Santiago gonzález (tve), josé miguel contreras (lasexta) and javier bardají (antena 3) were some of those who attended. -- the ' indignants ' also wanted to play a leading role in the debate. They divided into two groups, although the national police riot police blocked all access. They carried pots and shouted: “we also want to debate” or “this debate is a pantomime.” they were only 50 meters from the building . Neither rubalcaba nor rajoy made any mention of the 15-m movement.The candidates wore dark suits in both cases, both with blue ties. At the beginning, rubalcaba seemed much more tense, while rajoy tried to smile. The stage was cold, and the moderator, campo vidal , was reluctant in the introduction, which was too long. During the rest of the evening, the presenter was barely noticed, except at some point when he tried to stop rubalcaba. The debate was not spectacular at practically any point. It was quite predictable, and therefore it will have hardly any effect on voting intentions.
At its end, the two parties proclaimed the victory of their respective representative. The psoe was more active , sending telephone messages to journalists and opinion leaders talking about “rubalcaba's victory by a landslide.” a 'trend Special Database topic' with the phrase “ rajoy wins ” triumphed on twitter . The polls on the progress of abc and el mundo gave the leader of the pp as the winner. According to el país, rajoy won by 5 points : 46% to 41%. Two very different parts the confrontation had two very different parts. The initial one, with an aggressive alfredo pérez rubalcaba , trying to corner or disconcert mariano rajoy, insisting on asking him questions and emphasizing that he was not answering him, and in which the leader of the pp did not enter into any of the traps that he set for him. . The main mistake made by the socialist candidate was that in practically all his interventions he assumed that rajoy would win the elections , with questions about “what he will do” in the different fields that he was raising. After the break, in the second half it was noted that both politicians had received advice from their teams .
Rubalcaba was less of a harasser and on some occasions did not take his rival's victory for granted. Rajoy, for his part, was somewhat more incisive , also questioning his opponent, occasionally accusing her of lying and repeating the statement that he was lying. The pp program throughout the debate, the talk was mainly about the pp program , because rubalcaba focused a large part of his intervention on explaining it, criticizing it and asking questions to his rival. He dedicated more time to that intention than to exposing his own proposals. For this reason, he barely gave the impression that he really saw himself as a candidate to preside over the government, and rather behaved as an 'opposition leader'. Rajoy was more effective in outlining his plans and proposals, always starting from the fact that spain is in a bad situation due to the government's incapacity and concluding with the need for change. It was quite easy for him in more than one moment to debunk his rival's accusations of him by resorting to what he had done and approved by the previous executive.